When evaluating research for practice changes, the nurse must first determine if there is reasonable similarity between the nurse's unit population and the study population to expect equivocal results. This should be the initial consideration to ensure that the research is appropriate for a given setting. For instance, if the nurse cares for pediatric clients with acute pain, the protocol for adult clients with terminal cancer might not translate effectively or safely to those clients.
Other aspects of the study to evaluate include whether all clinically relevant outcomes were addressed, if the benefits outweigh any potential harm or costs, and if the protocol resulted in improved care.
(Option 1) An institutional review board (IRB) is a committee that reviews research before it is conducted to ensure that is it ethical. Legally, any study of human subjects needs IRB approval to provide protection from unnecessary risk. Peer-reviewed journals usually require a statement of IRB approval before accepting an article for publication. However, the IRB process does not determine whether the findings are relevant for a particular setting.
(Option 3) The educational credentials of a researcher may be relevant, especially if a non-health care professional has conducted a health care study. However, the integrity of the research process and findings is more important than the holding of any particular degree.
(Option 4) Financial support can be considered, particularly when research finds favorably for a drug or product that is manufactured or supported by a sponsor of the study. Although it is essential for a financial relationship to be disclosed, that alone does not negate the usefulness of the study
When evaluating research for practice changes, the nurse must first determine if there is reasonable similarity between the nurse's unit population and the study population to expect equivocal results. This should be the initial consideration to ensure that the research is appropriate for a given setting. For instance, if the nurse cares for pediatric clients with acute pain, the protocol for adult clients with terminal cancer might not translate effectively or safely to those clients.
Other aspects of the study to evaluate include whether all clinically relevant outcomes were addressed, if the benefits outweigh any potential harm or costs, and if the protocol resulted in improved care.
(Option 1) An institutional review board (IRB) is a committee that reviews research before it is conducted to ensure that is it ethical. Legally, any study of human subjects needs IRB approval to provide protection from unnecessary risk. Peer-reviewed journals usually require a statement of IRB approval before accepting an article for publication. However, the IRB process does not determine whether the findings are relevant for a particular setting.
(Option 3) The educational credentials of a researcher may be relevant, especially if a non-health care professional has conducted a health care study. However, the integrity of the research process and findings is more important than the holding of any particular degree.
(Option 4) Financial support can be considered, particularly when research finds favorably for a drug or product that is manufactured or supported by a sponsor of the study. Although it is essential for a financial relationship to be disclosed, that alone does not negate the usefulness of the study